A scrap broker who addressed attendees at an international scrap convention referred to the copper market as “much like a battlefield” that is becoming more complicated as copper makes its way to different parts of the world.
Speaking to attendees of the Nonferrous Division meeting at the Bureau of International Recycling (BIR) Spring Convention in Monte Carlo, Simon Mao of Shanghai Dachang Copper Ind. Co. said the conflicts between brokers, dealers, traders and end users “often make business more complicated than before,” adding that it had become more difficult to manage the supply chain and overseas purchasing agents.
Despite the complications, a pattern toward greater Chinese consumption seems clear. Mao noted that China’s copper scrap imports reached an all-time high of 3.3 million metric tons last year, with more than 90 percent of that scrap coming from the U.S., Hong Kong, Japan and western Europe. Demand will continue to grow over the next five years, leading to increasingly tough competition for material on the international markets, added Mao. He singled out the birch/cliff and berry/candy grades as being in particular demand.
The U.S. can ship scrap copper in part because it has lost more than 275,000 short tons of domestic annual No 2 copper consumption in the last seven years, according to Glen Gross, CEO of Pittsburgh-based Wimco Metals. There are no longer any No. 2 copper secondary smelters in the U.S., said Gross, and China has emerged as the major outlet for No 2 scrap, followed by South Korea and Germany.
Gross commented that U.S. shippers have adjusted their No 2 shipments with respect to quality, form and conveyance, while paperwork has also become more complex. “There has been too much confusion for suppliers as to the quality demands of their new foreign users,” he remarked. “At some point, foreign consumers need to issue detailed specifications for acceptable product. The nebulous terms ‘birch/cliff’ and ‘No 2 copper minimum 94%’ need to be more clearly defined by each consumer.”
Gross also pointed to the potentially huge impact on international markets of an increase in copper prices and, therefore, copper scrap generation. “In the 1990s it was eastern European scrap that flooded international scrap markets, and in the 2000s it could be American scrap,” he warned.
In Europe, exports of copper scrap to the Far East were increasing dramatically at a time when local availability in the EU was falling, thereby creating “severe” problems for European secondary copper refiners, according to Peter Müller of Montanwerke Brixlegg AG, Austria. He stated that “unfair” customs regulations as well as lower labor and environmental costs in some countries had enabled local producers to pay higher prices for their scrap. If Europe’s refiners failed to cover costs, it could be only “a matter of time” before closures on the same scale as in the U.S. occurred.Latest from Recycling Today
- AISI, Aluminum Association cite USMCA triangular trading concerns
- Nucor names new president
- DOE rare earths funding is open to recyclers
- Design for Recycling Resolution introduced
- PetStar PET recycling plant expands
- Iron Bull addresses scrap handling needs with custom hoppers
- REgroup, CP Group to build advanced MRF in Nova Scotia
- Oregon county expands options for hard-to-recycling items