BIR Spring Convention: Confidentiality is Plastics Concern

EU shipping regulations could hamper broker-supplier confidentiality.

Problems that could arise for exporters as a result of the revision of EU Shipment Regulations came under scrutiny at the BIR Plastics Committee meeting, which took place at the 2007 BIR Spring Convention in Athens May 21-23.

 

Past Chairman Peter Daalder of Dutch company Daly Plastics BV remarked that, starting this July, EU shipments of materials designated as waste were required to be accompanied by a form which effectively revealed the name of suppliers to the customer. Business owners would therefore suffer potentially adverse consequences of this loss of confidentiality, he suggested.

 

Current BIR Plastics Committee Chairman Surendra Borad of Belgium-based Gemini Corporation NV also pointed out that, at the time of the meeting in Athens, China had yet to respond to whether these new EU regulations applied to plastic scrap shipments. If no reply is received ahead of July 12, it is possible that EU exports of plastic scrap could become subject to time-consuming and expensive “red list” requirements.

 

According to Jacques Musa of Veolia Propreté France Recycling, other major concerns surrounding exports to China included “constant” hikes in entrance taxes and inland transport costs, as well as the strength of the Euro in relation to the U.S. dollar. “Reinforcement of quality controls by the Chinese authorities must be taken into consideration,” he added.

 

As for the French market, Musa noted a decline in available volumes of all forms of secondary plastic at a time of increasing demand. According to Marc Figueras, who also works for Veolia Propreté France Recycling, conditions in the Spanish market were quite healthy despite a period of “excessive” raw material prices. In Germany and the Netherlands, meanwhile, recyclers were proving to be “very competitive,” noted Daalder.

 

In Australia, plastics consumption was largely “flat” and yet reprocessing was recording “double digit” annual growth, observed Borad. At a time of “soaring” exports to China, Australia had set itself a plastics recycling rate goal of 30 percent by 2008. Also reporting on the Indian market, the Plastics Committee Chairman noted that only 26 industrial units were authorized to import plastic scrap - mainly in the form of LDPE and PET - and that no new permits were being issued.

 

Commenting on the South African market, Bertrand Reverdy of Green Bird in the Reunion Islands explained that a “booming” domestic economy had created a huge demand for packaging materials. These included PP and HDPE, as well as PET bottles which were currently enjoying a recycling rate of around 10 percent, he noted.

 

PET recycling also provided the focus for Plastics Committee guest speaker Corrado Dentis of Dentis SRL in Italy, a company that operates two lines with a combined mechanical recycling capacity of some 35,000 metric tons of PET bottles each year.

 

Its end products had been sold exclusively into the fiber market only a few years ago but the customer base had since expanded to include manufacturers of sheet material, strapping, bottles and automotive parts. According to Dentis, modern recycling technology could overcome any issues relating to quality but the lack of available raw material constituted “a major problem” in Europe.